“Drums of Bidah” Part-1

Beating …“Drums of Bihah”


“Bid`ah: Highway to Hellfire”

“Indeed, the most evil of matters (in the religion) are the newly invented ones, and every innovation (in the religion) is abid`ah,and every bid`ah is misguidance, and every misguidance is in the Hellfire.”

[Authinticated by Al-Albani]


Bid`ah: Highway to Hellfire – IslamOnline.net – Living Sharia’h

“Bidah a Burden”

“And the burden in the Hereafter will be much bigger, for “every bid’ah is in the Fire.”




“Bidah Here, Bidah There and Bidah Everywhere”


Quote, Wahabi Bigot:


“some of the ulama of past when saying “bidah hasana”they mean in general terms, meaning they weren’t speaking about bidah in deen, if you check the examples they gave for bidah hasanah you will see that it wasn’t in matters of deen/worship.”



“Bidah Dance”


“However, people like Yasir Qadhi state the opposite. In fact, they go as far as to say that Tawheed al-Haakimiyyah is bid’ah. It is indeed strange for someone to make such a statement – and we hope that he had already retracted this statement or will so in the near future – since it implies that he rejects a form ofTawheed al-’Uloohiyyah. The definition of Tawheed al-’Uloohiyyah is that one recognizes that it is only Allah who is worthy of obedience and worship”



The scholars who said 3 divisions in Tawheed is OK but fourth is a Biddah?

The blind followers of Ibn Tayamiyah like alAlbani , ibn Baz , Uthaymeen , Fawzan… etc, they called the fourth division as Biddah!!!


Shaikh Ibn Uthaimeen on Tawhid ul-Hakimiyyah

Shaikh Muhammad ibn Saalih al-‘Uthaimeen was asked concerning this, and he replied that:

“Whoever claims that there is a fourth category of tawheed under the title ‘Tawheed al-Haakimiyyah’ is to be counted as an innovator (mubtadi’). So this is an innovated categorisation which emanates from an ignorant person….

[Taken from ‘al-Muslimoon,’ no. 639, 25th of Dhul-Hijjah 1417H which corresponds to Friday the 2nd of May 1997]

Shaikh Salih al-Fawzaan on Tawheed ul-Haakimiyyah

Questioner 1:

There is someone who has made a fourth category for Tawheed and called it Tawheed al-Haakimiyyah

Shaikh Fawzaan: [interjecting]… This is misguidance…, this is misguidance. This is misguidance and an [unnecessary] addition, which the people of knowledge have not affirmed. Tawheed is buttwo or three categories… this is contradictory, one person says Tawheed is only one category and another says it is four categories. All of this is misguidance….

lol-8558.gif… he can’t even make his mind up to whether there are 2 or 3 categories SubhanAllah…this is great stuff…oh but it goes further:

Questioner 2:

So this is an innovated saying, this saying [Tawheed ul-Haakimiyyah]?

Shaikh Fawzaan: Yes, there is no doubt in this, it is in opposition to the Ijmaa [of Ahl us-Sunnah]. None of the people of knowledge have ever spoken with it. It is in opposition to the Ijmaa.” End

The Statement of Shaikh al-Ghunayman

One of those upon whose words the Qutubiyyah relied upon is Shaikh al-Ghunayman. The Shaikh stated when asked about Tawhid ul-Haakimiyyah,

“It is not permissible to deny Tawheed al-Haakimiyyah, for it is from the types of Tawheed. But it falls under Tawheed al-‘Ibaadah with regards to the ruler himself as a person. With regards to it meaning Tawheed, then it falls under ar-Ruboobeeyyah, because the Ruler is Allaah. So it should be that the Rabb is the Muttasarrif (Controller of affairs), He is the One who has the Hukm, so it falls under Tawheed Ar-Ruboobiyyah with regards to ruling, ordering, prohibiting, and carrying out, whereas regards to application and action then the slave is responsible for following the Hukm of Allaah, so then it is from Tawheed Al-‘Ibaadah in this sense. And making it into a fourth category doesn’t make sense because it falls into the three categories. And the division without a reason is a cause of extra words which are not needed, and it is a simple matter anyway. If he makes it a separate category then he is being redundant, and there is no harm it.”

Ibn Uthaymin:
Shaikh Muhammad ibn Saalih al-‘Uthaimeen was asked concerning this, and he replied that:

“Whoever claims that there is a fourth category of tawheed under the title ‘Tawheed al-Haakimiyyah’ is to be counted as an innovator (mubtadi’). So this is an innovated categorisation which emanates from an ignorant person who does not understand anything of the affairs of ‘aqeedah and the deen.

This is because ‘al-Haakimiyyah’ falls within Tawheedur-Ruboobiyyah from the aspect that Allaah decrees whatever He wills.

It also enters under Tawheedur-Ruboobiyyah in that the servant must worship Allaah according to what He has decreed. So it does not fall outside the three categories of tawheed, which are: Tawheedur-Ruboobiyyah, Tawheedul-Uloohiyyah and Tawheedul-Asmaa was-Sifaat.”

Then, when asked, ‘How are we to rebut them?’ he replied:

“We rebut them by saying to them, ‘What does ‘al-Haakimiyyah’ mean?’ It does not mean except their saying that judgement/decree is for Allaah alone ‘ and that is Tawheedur-Ruboobiyyah. So Allaah, He is the Lord, the Creator, the Sovereign Owner, the One in control of the affairs. But as for what they intend by it and an explanation of the danger of this idea of theirs, then we do not know their intentions and desire, so therefore we cannot estimate the seriousness of this matter.’

Taken from ‘al-Muslimoon,’ no. 639, 25th of Dhul-Hijjah 1417H which corresponds to Friday the 2nd of May 1997.


Shaikh Muhammad Naasiruddeen al-Albaanee was asked, “Our Shaikh, may Allaah bless you, the scholars of the Salaf, may Allaah have mercy upon them, mention that Tawheed is of three types: ‘ar-Ruboobiyyah,’ ‘al-Uloohiyyah’ and ‘al-Asmaa was-Sifaat,’ so is it correct for us to say that there is a fourth Tawheed that is ‘Tawheedul-Haakimiyyah’ or ‘Tawheed of Judgement?’ So he replied:

“‘Al-Haakimiyyah’ is a branch of the branches of Tawheedul-Uloohiyyah, and those who focus their attention upon this newly invented saying in the present age use it as a weapon not to teach the Muslims the Tawheed that all of the Prophets and Messengers came with, but rather as apolitical weapon. So if you wish I will establish for you what I have just said, even though this question has repeatedly been answered by me, many times – or if you wish we will continue upon our topic.


Regarding Tawhid al-Hakimiyya, scholars were wrong in calling this fourth division as Bidah…

As per these scholars there can be no further division!!



The pseudo-Salafiyya do not recognise the concept of”Bid’a Hasana”, and if they were too they would have to admit that the division of Tawhid into 2,3 or 4areas, is at least a Bid’a Hasana to their Ulama like Ibn Taymiyya onwards…

Wahabi/Salafi are totally divided on the issue of Tawhid and its branches,

especially on the issue of al-Hakimiyya they are bitterly at odds with each other, to the extent they make Tabdi (calling someone an innovator) over the affirmation or denial of this concept.

Even If It is assumed that It is “Bidat al Hasanah” then it will still be an “Evil innovation” in their sight because wahabi/salafi do not believe in classification of Bidah into good or bad.

“we do not believe!”